APIClaw vs Audexum

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%98.9%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms661386
P95 · ms7002629
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-10-302026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

APIClaw vs Audexum: common questions

Which is more reliable, APIClaw or Audexum?

On our scheduled checks, APIClaw leads on measured uptime — APIClaw at 100% versus Audexum at 98.9% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, APIClaw or Audexum?

Audexum has the lower median latency in our checks — APIClaw responds in 661 ms versus Audexum at 386 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do APIClaw and Audexum need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — APIClaw uses an API key and Audexum uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call APIClaw and Audexum from the browser?

Yes — both APIClaw and Audexum send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are APIClaw and Audexum free for commercial use?

APIClaw has unclear commercial terms, and Audexum has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.