国会会議録検索API vs TotalShiftLeft Sandbox
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
国会会議録検索API vs TotalShiftLeft Sandbox: common questions
Which is more reliable, 国会会議録検索API or TotalShiftLeft Sandbox?
On our scheduled checks, TotalShiftLeft Sandbox leads on measured uptime — 国会会議録検索API at 86.3% versus TotalShiftLeft Sandbox at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, 国会会議録検索API or TotalShiftLeft Sandbox?
TotalShiftLeft Sandbox has the lower median latency in our checks — 国会会議録検索API responds in 3456 ms versus TotalShiftLeft Sandbox at 328 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do 国会会議録検索API and TotalShiftLeft Sandbox need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — 国会会議録検索API is callable with no signup, and TotalShiftLeft Sandbox is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call 国会会議録検索API and TotalShiftLeft Sandbox from the browser?
Only 国会会議録検索API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. TotalShiftLeft Sandbox needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are 国会会議録検索API and TotalShiftLeft Sandbox free for commercial use?
国会会議録検索API has unclear commercial terms, and TotalShiftLeft Sandbox has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.