国会会議録検索API vs RSQ API
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
国会会議録検索API vs RSQ API: common questions
Which is more reliable, 国会会議録検索API or RSQ API?
On our scheduled checks, RSQ API leads on measured uptime — 国会会議録検索API at 86.3% versus RSQ API at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, 国会会議録検索API or RSQ API?
RSQ API has the lower median latency in our checks — 国会会議録検索API responds in 3456 ms versus RSQ API at 783 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do 国会会議録検索API and RSQ API need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — 国会会議録検索API is callable with no signup, and RSQ API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call 国会会議録検索API and RSQ API from the browser?
Only 国会会議録検索API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. RSQ API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are 国会会議録検索API and RSQ API free for commercial use?
国会会議録検索API has unclear commercial terms, and RSQ API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.