shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

国会会議録検索API vs Hunter

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

API国会会議録検索APIHEALTHY72HunterHEALTHY96
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d86.3%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms3456362
P95 · ms4990859
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

国会会議録検索API vs Hunter: common questions

Which is more reliable, 国会会議録検索API or Hunter?

On our scheduled checks, Hunter leads on measured uptime — 国会会議録検索API at 86.3% versus Hunter at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, 国会会議録検索API or Hunter?

Hunter has the lower median latency in our checks — 国会会議録検索API responds in 3456 ms versus Hunter at 362 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do 国会会議録検索API and Hunter need an API key?

国会会議録検索API needs no key, while Hunter requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for 国会会議録検索API first.

Can I call 国会会議録検索API and Hunter from the browser?

Only 国会会議録検索API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Hunter needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are 国会会議録検索API and Hunter free for commercial use?

国会会議録検索API has unclear commercial terms, and Hunter has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.