国会会議録検索API vs Autoscrape API
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
国会会議録検索API vs Autoscrape API: common questions
Which is more reliable, 国会会議録検索API or Autoscrape API?
On our scheduled checks, Autoscrape API leads on measured uptime — 国会会議録検索API at 86.3% versus Autoscrape API at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, 国会会議録検索API or Autoscrape API?
Autoscrape API has the lower median latency in our checks — 国会会議録検索API responds in 3456 ms versus Autoscrape API at 717 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do 国会会議録検索API and Autoscrape API need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — 国会会議録検索API is callable with no signup, and Autoscrape API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call 国会会議録検索API and Autoscrape API from the browser?
Yes — both 国会会議録検索API and Autoscrape API send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are 国会会議録検索API and Autoscrape API free for commercial use?
国会会議録検索API has unclear commercial terms, and Autoscrape API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.