An API of Ice And Fire vs ShotOG

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms72185
P95 · ms1292647
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree, no keyFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

An API of Ice And Fire vs ShotOG: common questions

Which is more reliable, An API of Ice And Fire or ShotOG?

Both are neck-and-neck — An API of Ice And Fire and ShotOG each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, An API of Ice And Fire or ShotOG?

An API of Ice And Fire has the lower median latency in our checks — An API of Ice And Fire responds in 72 ms versus ShotOG at 185 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do An API of Ice And Fire and ShotOG need an API key?

An API of Ice And Fire needs no key, while ShotOG requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for An API of Ice And Fire first.

Can I call An API of Ice And Fire and ShotOG from the browser?

Only An API of Ice And Fire is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. ShotOG needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are An API of Ice And Fire and ShotOG free for commercial use?

An API of Ice And Fire has unclear commercial terms, and ShotOG has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.