An API of Ice And Fire vs Screenshotlayer

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms
P95 · ms
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree, no keyFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

An API of Ice And Fire vs Screenshotlayer: common questions

Which is more reliable, An API of Ice And Fire or Screenshotlayer?

On our scheduled checks, Screenshotlayer leads on measured uptime — An API of Ice And Fire at —% versus Screenshotlayer at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do An API of Ice And Fire and Screenshotlayer need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — An API of Ice And Fire is callable with no signup, and Screenshotlayer is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call An API of Ice And Fire and Screenshotlayer from the browser?

Only An API of Ice And Fire is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Screenshotlayer needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are An API of Ice And Fire and Screenshotlayer free for commercial use?

An API of Ice And Fire has unclear commercial terms, and Screenshotlayer has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.