shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Amanah Sunnah vs Wiktionary

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIAmanah SunnahHEALTHY93WiktionaryHEALTHY92
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.44%99.44%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms456367
P95 · ms33034709
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearyes
Data licenseUnverifiedContent under CC BY-SA 4.0 / GFDL
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — public MediaWiki action API
Rate limitUnpublishedNo hard published cap; Wikimedia User-Agent policy and request-etiquette apply
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Amanah Sunnah vs Wiktionary: common questions

Which is more reliable, Amanah Sunnah or Wiktionary?

Both are neck-and-neck — Amanah Sunnah and Wiktionary each measure 99.44% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Amanah Sunnah or Wiktionary?

Wiktionary has the lower median latency in our checks — Amanah Sunnah responds in 456 ms versus Wiktionary at 367 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Amanah Sunnah and Wiktionary need an API key?

Wiktionary needs no key, while Amanah Sunnah requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Wiktionary first.

Can I call Amanah Sunnah and Wiktionary from the browser?

Only Amanah Sunnah is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Wiktionary needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Amanah Sunnah and Wiktionary free for commercial use?

Amanah Sunnah has unclear commercial terms, and Wiktionary allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.