airportsapi vs CarVector

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d88.2%100%
Uptime · 30d85.0%100%
P50 · ms821547
P95 · ms49691824
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

airportsapi vs CarVector: common questions

Which is more reliable, airportsapi or CarVector?

On our scheduled checks, CarVector leads on measured uptime — airportsapi at 88.2% versus CarVector at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, airportsapi or CarVector?

CarVector has the lower median latency in our checks — airportsapi responds in 821 ms versus CarVector at 547 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do airportsapi and CarVector need an API key?

airportsapi needs no key, while CarVector requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for airportsapi first.

Can I call airportsapi and CarVector from the browser?

Only airportsapi is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. CarVector needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are airportsapi and CarVector free for commercial use?

airportsapi has unclear commercial terms, and CarVector has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.