shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

AI Dev Jobs vs Disify

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIAI Dev JobsHEALTHY88DisifyDYING38
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%42.2%
Uptime · 30d100%28.3%
P50 · ms3391075
P95 · ms9411679
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — public read endpoints openFree — limits not published
Rate limitHourly abuse throttle; optional free API key30 req/window · 21 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

AI Dev Jobs vs Disify: common questions

Which is more reliable, AI Dev Jobs or Disify?

On our scheduled checks, AI Dev Jobs leads on measured uptime — AI Dev Jobs at 100% versus Disify at 42.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, AI Dev Jobs or Disify?

AI Dev Jobs has the lower median latency in our checks — AI Dev Jobs responds in 339 ms versus Disify at 1075 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do AI Dev Jobs and Disify need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — AI Dev Jobs is callable with no signup, and Disify is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call AI Dev Jobs and Disify from the browser?

Only AI Dev Jobs is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Disify needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are AI Dev Jobs and Disify free for commercial use?

AI Dev Jobs has unclear commercial terms, and Disify has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.