shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

AbuseIPDB vs FullHunt

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIAbuseIPDBNEW—FullHuntNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

AbuseIPDB vs FullHunt: common questions

Which is more reliable, AbuseIPDB or FullHunt?

On our scheduled checks, FullHunt leads on measured uptime — AbuseIPDB at —% versus FullHunt at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do AbuseIPDB and FullHunt need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — AbuseIPDB uses an API key and FullHunt uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call AbuseIPDB and FullHunt from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call AbuseIPDB and FullHunt from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are AbuseIPDB and FullHunt free for commercial use?

AbuseIPDB has unclear commercial terms, and FullHunt has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.