shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Abstract Email Validation vs FakerAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIAbstract Email ValidationDEAD0FakerAPIDEAD0
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d0.0%1.0%
Uptime · 30d0.0%0.0%
P50 · ms—860
P95 · ms—860
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — 100 requests/monthFree — no key
Rate limit100 requests/month on free plan60 req/window · 59 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Abstract Email Validation vs FakerAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, Abstract Email Validation or FakerAPI?

On our scheduled checks, FakerAPI leads on measured uptime — Abstract Email Validation at 0.0% versus FakerAPI at 1.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Abstract Email Validation and FakerAPI need an API key?

FakerAPI needs no key, while Abstract Email Validation requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for FakerAPI first.

Can I call Abstract Email Validation and FakerAPI from the browser?

Only Abstract Email Validation is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. FakerAPI needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Abstract Email Validation and FakerAPI free for commercial use?

Abstract Email Validation has unclear commercial terms, and FakerAPI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.