shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Abstract API vs Audexum

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIAbstract APIHEALTHY89AudexumHEALTHY93
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%97.1%
Uptime · 30d98.3%95.0%
P50 · ms700417
P95 · ms16561103
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key may be required for productionFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Abstract API vs Audexum: common questions

Which is more reliable, Abstract API or Audexum?

On our scheduled checks, Abstract API leads on measured uptime — Abstract API at 99.02% versus Audexum at 97.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Abstract API or Audexum?

Audexum has the lower median latency in our checks — Abstract API responds in 700 ms versus Audexum at 417 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Abstract API and Audexum need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Abstract API uses an API key and Audexum uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Abstract API and Audexum from the browser?

Yes — both Abstract API and Audexum send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Abstract API and Audexum free for commercial use?

Abstract API has unclear commercial terms, and Audexum has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.