shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Abstract API vs APIClaw

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIAbstract APIHEALTHY92APIClawREACHABLE100
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.3%100%
Uptime · 30d98.3%100%
P50 · ms429661
P95 · ms1656700
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key may be required for production
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-10-30
operationalpartialdownno data

Abstract API vs APIClaw: common questions

Which is more reliable, Abstract API or APIClaw?

On our scheduled checks, APIClaw leads on measured uptime — Abstract API at 98.3% versus APIClaw at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Abstract API or APIClaw?

Abstract API has the lower median latency in our checks — Abstract API responds in 429 ms versus APIClaw at 661 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Abstract API and APIClaw need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Abstract API uses an API key and APIClaw uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Abstract API and APIClaw from the browser?

Yes — both Abstract API and APIClaw send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Abstract API and APIClaw free for commercial use?

Abstract API has unclear commercial terms, and APIClaw has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.