24 Pull Requests vs Scrnify

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms678927
P95 · ms27851742
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

24 Pull Requests vs Scrnify: common questions

Which is more reliable, 24 Pull Requests or Scrnify?

Both are neck-and-neck — 24 Pull Requests and Scrnify each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, 24 Pull Requests or Scrnify?

24 Pull Requests has the lower median latency in our checks — 24 Pull Requests responds in 678 ms versus Scrnify at 927 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do 24 Pull Requests and Scrnify need an API key?

24 Pull Requests needs no key, while Scrnify requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for 24 Pull Requests first.

Can I call 24 Pull Requests and Scrnify from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call 24 Pull Requests and Scrnify from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are 24 Pull Requests and Scrnify free for commercial use?

24 Pull Requests has unclear commercial terms, and Scrnify has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.