24 Pull Requests vs RSQ API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms678783
P95 · ms27851387
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesno
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

24 Pull Requests vs RSQ API: common questions

Which is more reliable, 24 Pull Requests or RSQ API?

Both are neck-and-neck — 24 Pull Requests and RSQ API each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, 24 Pull Requests or RSQ API?

24 Pull Requests has the lower median latency in our checks — 24 Pull Requests responds in 678 ms versus RSQ API at 783 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do 24 Pull Requests and RSQ API need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — 24 Pull Requests is callable with no signup, and RSQ API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call 24 Pull Requests and RSQ API from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call 24 Pull Requests and RSQ API from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are 24 Pull Requests and RSQ API free for commercial use?

24 Pull Requests has unclear commercial terms, and RSQ API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.