24 Pull Requests vs IPLocate.io
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
24 Pull Requests vs IPLocate.io: common questions
Which is more reliable, 24 Pull Requests or IPLocate.io?
On our scheduled checks, 24 Pull Requests leads on measured uptime — 24 Pull Requests at 100% versus IPLocate.io at 71.6% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, 24 Pull Requests or IPLocate.io?
IPLocate.io has the lower median latency in our checks — 24 Pull Requests responds in 678 ms versus IPLocate.io at 56 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do 24 Pull Requests and IPLocate.io need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — 24 Pull Requests is callable with no signup, and IPLocate.io is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call 24 Pull Requests and IPLocate.io from the browser?
Only IPLocate.io is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. 24 Pull Requests needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are 24 Pull Requests and IPLocate.io free for commercial use?
24 Pull Requests has unclear commercial terms, and IPLocate.io has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.