shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

0x vs Trading View

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

API0xHEALTHY91Trading ViewHEALTHY93
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms622511
P95 · ms34211648
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

0x vs Trading View: common questions

Which is more reliable, 0x or Trading View?

Both are neck-and-neck — 0x and Trading View each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, 0x or Trading View?

Trading View has the lower median latency in our checks — 0x responds in 622 ms versus Trading View at 511 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do 0x and Trading View need an API key?

0x needs no key, while Trading View requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for 0x first.

Can I call 0x and Trading View from the browser?

Only 0x is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Trading View needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are 0x and Trading View free for commercial use?

0x has unclear commercial terms, and Trading View has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.